Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Snoop Dogg temporarily changes his name to Niggarachi: How does this help anything?



Rapper Snoop Dogg changes his name to Niggarachi for the upcoming compilation album Bacc To Tha Chuuch Vol, 1.

This makes me ill. However, Snoop Dogg often uses the word nigger in his music and in communication so perhaps I should not be surprised.

I am a firm believer that it is irresponsible for anyone to embrace this word in any form. I am fully aware that some attempt to reclaim nigger just as some attempt to reclaim other oppressive terms such as bitch or fag. Has it worked? I think not. Has racism, homophobia and sexism decreased on account of embracing this type of language? No.

I imagine Snoop Dogg is aware that this new name will draw in attention, some positive and some negative. Perhaps he is attempting to be rebellious or even humorous as the name Niggarachi is obviously a play on the name of famous piano composer Liberace.

I visited several websites that have posted news of the rapper's new stage alias and some have said that only Snoop Dogg could get away with something like this. My question is, why is he excused?

I'm not a Snoop fan myself, but if a music artist I admired made this choice I would take issue with it. I hope that fans will not allow themselves to be so blinded by his supposed cool factor that they cannot see how socially irresponsible this move is.

Snoop, when I hear the word nigger used in context, I am confronted with images. Images of separate water fountains, the KKK and lynch mobs. I see these images in my mind whether I hear the word nigger or nigga or yes even a ridiculous name such as Niggarachi.

As a person who is not black myself, I do not know what it is like to have this word darted my way. I also do not know how it feels to attempt to reclaim the word and reintroduce it into black communities. I do not shame black individuals who have attempted to dull the pain of racism by "turning it around" and allowing the word to be an example of casual communication rather than violence and oppression. I just think that it has been attempted and it has failed. Time to drop the n-word folks...you too Snoop.

Angry Green Girls promote going green by exploiting women



“hot, green, and shameless”


Andrea K aka Angry Green Girl promotes a hybrid-only car wash by women in bikinis

Angry Green Girl is a social networking site that promotes eco-friendly practices. What's unfortunate is that they seem to be following in PETAs footsteps by promoting a good cause by exploiting women.


Angry Green Girl promotes green causes through sexism


This is a very sad recruiting tactic but it seems to be popular. It seems that their overt sexism is obvious but apparently Angry Green Girl quite enjoy frolicking in bikinis.

Former Charles Manson follower Susan Atkins will soon die - Parole hearing will decide whether she will be released to die at home


(www.susanatkins.org)
Susan Atkins 1969

It's been 40 years since former Charles Manson follower, Susan Atkins committed the murder of the then pregnant actress Sharon Tate. Atkins stabbed Tate 16 times.

Atkins is 61 years old and is dying from brain cancer. Atkins' husband and attorney, James Whitehouse is hoping she will be released so that she may die at home. It is reported that Atkins only has a few weeks to live. She is paralyzed over 85% of her body and not stable.


Oct. 13, 1970 photo. Here Charles Manson walks into the courtroom as Susan Atkins, a member of his followers. (AP)

The murder occurred when actress Sharon Tate was 8 months pregnant. Tate's husband, director Roman Polanski was in London at the time of the murder as he was working on a film. Tate was being visited by three friends. One was coffee heiress Abigail Folger and her boyfriend Wojciech Frykowski, and the third was Tate’s former boyfriend, hairstylist Jay Sebring.

Frykowski, who was in the living room on the couch, was kicked in the head by Manson Follower "Tex" Watson. At one point Watson proclaimed, “I’m the devil, and I’m here to do the devil’s business.” Frykowski attempted to escape and Atkins stabbed him in the legs. As he made his way outside, Watson hit him in the head with a gun, stabbed him, and shot him twice. Folger tried to escape as well and Krenwinkel tackled her on the front lawn stabbing her 28 times. Frykowski was still alive and struggled on the lawn, before Watson stabbed him 21 times.

Tate pleaded with Susan Atkins to spare the life of her baby. She cried, “Mother… mother… mother…” while Atkins stabbed her 16 times. As the Manson followers left they wrote the word "Pig" on the door of the home using Tate’s blood.

It is my belief that Atkins has rehabilitated. She has separated herself from Manson and his philosophies long ago. She has taken responsibility for her actions.

Atkins was diagnosed with brain cancer in March 2008. On May 15th, 2009 Atkins was given less than six months to live.

In the past, California Govenor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Sharon Tate's sister, Debra Tate, have opposed Atkins’ release. Atkins has been denied parole 12 times. Apparently Debra Tate explained to CNN that she feels all of the Manson followers should remain in prison. She said the murders were “so vicious, so inhumane, so depraved, that there is no turning back.”

Atkins' hearing has been pushed to September of this year. Her husband fears that she may not live that long.


Susan Atkins interview with Diane Sawyer in 2002


Susan Atkins interview 1985 PART 1


Susan Atkins interview 1985 PART 2


Susan Atkins parole hearing 2009

Atkins has accomplished much in prison. A list of her accomplishments can be viewed here.
I cannot imagine the pain that the Tate family has suffered at the hand of Atkins. However, I do believe in rehabilitation and I think Atkins is not of the same mentality or spirit that she was when she met Manson.

Atkins will die soon and I imagine that Tate's sister is quite pleased. However, Atkins has not been a danger to society for many many years. I imagine Tate's sister carries not just anger and sorrow but hate for Susan Atkins.

Again, I do very much have empathy for the Tate family however, I think Atkins has more than paid her dues. If Atkins was not rehabilitated I would agree that she should remain in prison, but this is not the case.

I feel that Atkins must have much strength inside herself as she has not only had to accept her actions but she has had to make a life for herself even after a long process of healing.


Artwork By Susan Atkins
Title: Windows 2000 (I)
Dimensions: 19 1/2" x 12 1/2 "
Medium: Pastels
Date: 2000


Artwork by Susan Atkins
Title: Windows 2000 (II)

Dimensions: 12" x 18"
Medium: Pastels
Date: 2000


Artwork by Susan Atkins
Title Windows 2000 (III)
Dimensions: 12 1/2" x 19"
Medium: Pastels
Date: 2000

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

Racism 101 - a guest post from Macon D's StuffWhitePeopleDo blog

This is a guest post that was put up on http://stuffwhitepeopledo.blogspot.com today. I find it to be in keeping with a recent post I put up yesterday entitled "Macon D's "StuffWhitePeopleDo" blog and reflections on the birth of my own awkening".


***

This is a guest post by Robin F, who lives in Toronto. She writes at Dragon Life



Racism 101 for Clueless White People, Written by a Slightly Less Clueless White Person


People of Color (PoC) encounter the following on a regular basis: they're online or in real life and suddenly a white person, who barely understands privilege or racism, is demanding that they educate them regarding the topic. The white person says, in essence, "Hi! What can I do to help fix racism?" or "Hi! Can you explain racism to me?" or "Hi! What's this 'privilege' stuff?"

Understandably, the PoC says, "Google. You know how to use it." They say this because they're real people, who have real lives and commitments and other things they need to do, and they weren't born to go around educating white people who want to sit on their ass and have an education handed to them on a silver platter.

And then the white person gets butt-hurt because all they want to do is learn and they're trying to educate themselves and that PoC is being so mean to them! And then they sulk about it and often post about how they're trying to learn and become better people but damn it, PoC are so hostile, all that does is teach whites to shut up and sit down! And the white person fails to understand that the PoC wasn't saying, "You're a moron, shut up and sit down," they were saying, "Look, I don't have time to teach you. It's not my responsibility to give you Racism 101. Go educate yourself, the resources are out there."

(Of course even if a PoC says the latter, the white person often will respond with, "But it's such a big subject! I don't even know where to begin looking!" PoC just can't win in these discussions.)

Anyway, I'm familiar with this scenario because I was once That White Person myself, and I've since come across it repeated over and over and over. So, I have decided to make a Guide to Racism 101 for Clueless White People, written by a Slightly Less Clueless White Person.


1. Put some cream on your butt and get over the hurt. The PoC weren't angry at *you* per se; they're frustrated because you're the thousandth person who has made the same demand on their time. They're tired of being seen as objects that exist for the edification of whites, and even if you didn't realize that's how your question came across, the fact is that that's how your question came across.


2. If you're a LiveJournal user, go join [info]racism_101. Read the articles and posts linked to from within the userinfo and then start reading through the entries. It's an excellent starter-level community. Even if you don't have a LiveJournal account, you can still view all the public entries on the community.


3. Make sure you understand the definitions of the terms that are going to be used. The first thing you really need to understand is that the definition of racism that you probably have (which is the colloquial definition: "racism is prejudice against someone based on their skin color or ethnicity") is NOT the definition that's commonly used in anti-racist circles.

The definition used in anti-racist circles is the accepted sociological definition (which is commonly used in academic research, and has been used for more than a decade now): "racism is prejudice plus power". What this means, in easy language:

A. Anyone can hold "racial prejudice" -- that is, they can carry positive or negative stereotypes of others based on racial characteristics. For example, a white person thinking all Asians are smart, or all black people are criminals; or a Chinese person thinking Japanese people are untrustworthy; or what-have-you. ANYONE, of any race, can have racial prejudices.

B. People of any race can commit acts of violence, mistreatment, ostracizing, etc., based on their racial prejudices. A black kid can beat up a white kid because he doesn't like white kids. An Indian person can refuse to associate with Asians. Whatever, you get the idea.

C. However, to be racist (rather than simply prejudiced) requires having institutional power. In North America, white people have the institutional power. In large part we head the corporations; we make up the largest proportion of lawmakers and judges; we have the money; we make the decisions. In short, we control the systems that matter. "White" is presented as normal, the default. Because we have institutional power, when we think differently about people based on their race or act on our racial prejudices, we are being racist. Only white people can be racist, because only white people have institutional power.

D. People of color can be prejudiced, but they cannot be racist, because they don't have the institutional power. (However, some people refer to intra-PoC prejudice as "lateral racism". You may also hear the term "colorism", which refers to lighter-skinned PoC being prejudiced toward darker-skinned PoC.) However, that situation can be different in other countries; for example, a Japanese person in Japan can be racist against others, because the Japanese have the institutional power there. But in North America, Japanese people can't be racist because they don't hold the institutional power.

E. If you're in an area of your city/state/province that is predominantly populated by PoC and, as a white person, you get harassed because of your skin color, it's still not racism, even though you're in a PoC-dominated area. The fact is, even though they're the majority population in that area, they still lack the institutional power. They don't have their own special PoC-dominated police force for that area. They don't have their own special PoC-dominated courts in that area. The state/province and national media are still not dominated by PoC. Even though they have a large population in that particular area, they still lack the institutional power overall.

F. So that's the definition of racism that you're likely to encounter. If you start talking about "reverse racism" you're going to either get insulted or laughed at, because it isn't possible under that definition; PoC don't have the power in North America, so by definition, they can't be racist. Crying "reverse racism!" is like waving a Clueless White Person Badge around.

G. If you go into an anti-racist discussion and start trying to claim the colloquial definition that "racism is simply viewing or treating others differently based on race", you're going to get a negative reaction. Stick to "racism = prejudice + power". Anti-racists aren't going to take it well if you wander in halfway through the debate and start trying to make them abide by your definition rather than the commonly accepted "prejudice + power". Imagine if everyone in a classroom was chatting about a particular subject and then someone walked in and said, "No! You're all doing it wrong! The REAL definition is ABC and I don't care that all the rest of you think it's XYZ!" -- do you think that would go over well? Of course it wouldn't; the newcomer would be considered rude. (Also, making an appeal to Dictionary.com is not going to work. Pointing out that the colloquial definition is how Webster's Dictionary defines racism is not going to make anti-racists suddenly say, "Wow, you know what? You're right! I never realized it, but now that Webster's has backed you up, I see that you're totally right and racism really is just judging people based on their skin color!" Actually, they may say that, but they'd be saying it sarcastically.)

H. I'm under the impression there are a number of different reasons why anti-racists use the sociological definition as versus the colloquial one, but the major reason I'm aware of is that anti-racists aren't just focusing on individual acts of racism; they're looking at racism as an entrenched system that pervades every layer of our society. The colloquial definition reduces racism to an individual level; the sociological definition focuses on the systemic level. The systemic level is actually more important, because even as individual/obvious acts of racism become less socially acceptable, the systemic effects of institutionalized racism continue to work quietly, efficiently, and powerfully. Think of it like a body; it's easy to find a cancerous lesion on the skin and remove it, and then you'd look like you were cancer-free. But even as you looked fine on the surface, the real cancer would be inside your body, spreading from lymph node to lymph node, and invading your bones and organs. Individual and overt acts of racism are the lesions on the surface; the invisible cancer is the systemic racism. Unless you're addressing the underlying disease, eradicating surface symptoms isn't going to accomplish much. But that's enough about the definition of racism for now; let's continue.


4. Start learning about privilege. You need to understand what it is, and how it works. Read Peggy McIntosh's essay, Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack. (If that link is no longer good at some point, just Google it.) Acknowledge that you have privilege, through no fault or worth of your own; it was accorded to you at birth, and there's no way to get rid of it. It just is, under the current system of institutionalized racism.

If you feel like doing so, spend a little time coming up with your own list of the ways that privilege works in your life; this will give you a greater understanding of the disadvantages that PoC face. Understanding your privilege will help you learn how to:

A) use it for good when possible (for example, when I write this I am taking advantage of part of my white privilege, which is that whites tend to listen to other whites and afford them more credibility than they extend to PoC), and

B) not use it to hurt PoC inadvertently (for example, by going into a PoC "safe space" and taking over the conversation).


5. Put down that strawman! Nobody's asking you to feel guilty over having privilege. Guilt doesn't get us anywhere. We just want you to be aware of it. Just acknowledge it and be aware of it and move on, for now.


6. Next, learn about derailing. "Derailing" refers to the many ways that white people take a conversation about racism and privilege and, well, derail it -- make it all about them, rather than the PoC. This is almost always an unconscious act. Learning about how derailing works will help you learn how to avoid making the common derailing mistakes. Derailing for Dummies is a great resource. (Notice that the first two entries in Derailing for Dummies actually address the whole "educate me, PoC!" concept. It's THAT prevalent.) Then go read this post: The Art of Defending Racism. (You will also notice both the article and the post are written with a heavy dose of sarcasm. Sometimes it feels like you have to laugh so you don't cry, and sarcasm is a defense mechanism. Some people find sarcasm to be upsetting, but even if it bothers you, don't allow the tone to keep you from absorbing what's being said. It's important stuff.)


7. Do not make the mistake of believing that because you have a lack of privilege in one or more ways (examples: "I was/am poor", "I'm gay", "I'm female", etc), this means you understand what PoC go through.

A. We're all privileged in some ways and have lack of privilege in other ways. A straight black man has straight privilege and male privilege, but lacks white privilege. A gay white woman has white privilege, and lacks straight privilege and male privilege. (A straight white cisgendered male with no handicaps, born to wealthy parents, has all sorts of privilege.)

B. By saying that "you have white privilege", they're not saying "you don't know what it's like to be oppressed" -- they're saying "you don't know what it's like to experience racial oppression". You will not win points by saying, "But I'm gay/female/handicapped/etc, so I totally know where you're coming from!" Nor will it win you points to say, "But I live in an area of town dominated by [insert PoC group here] and people are always threatening me because I'm white, so I know what it's like to experience racism!" You don't. If that's your situation then you know what it's like to be on the brunt end of racial-based acts of prejudice, but you still don't know what it's like to live in a racist system day in and day out. (If you haven't yet read Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack as linked above, go do it now.)

C. To use an example of how racial privilege and class privilege are different: If you (as a white person) were obviously poor and at a country club, people would assume you’re a server. But if you were obviously rich and at a country club, nobody’s going to assume you’re a server. But if you’re a person of color and you’re at a country club, even if you’re obviously rich and dressed just as well as all the white people there, there’s still going to be some patrons assuming you’re a server and asking where their drinks are. Even if a PoC has ‘class privilege’ -- which means they’re rich or at least upper-middle-class -- that still never erases their lack of white privilege. They will always be seen first and foremost as a PoC. You, on the other hand, get to bypass that; people may judge you on your clothes or other visible markers of wealth, but they’re not going to judge you on the color of your skin en masse. That’s part of your white privilege.

D. To use another class/race example, if you were driving a really nice car, it's highly unlikely you'd get randomly pulled over (unless you were breaking the law, speeding, whatever), even if you're young. On the other hand, if you were black and driving a really nice car, you may well get pulled over just so the cop can check that it's really your car (and not just something you presumably stole).

E. You're going to come across the term "intersectionality". The definition is "intersectionality holds that the classical models of oppression within society, such as those based on race/ethnicity, gender, religion, nationality, sexual orientation, class, species or disability do not act independently of one another; instead, these forms of oppression interrelate, creating a system of oppression that reflects the 'intersection' of multiple forms of discrimination." In easier terms, this means that often different types of discrimination reinforce each other. Trying to tackle one system of oppression without dealing with other systems as well is going to leave some people in the cold. (This is a criticism often leveled at the current feminist movement; it's primarily working on issues that pertain to white women.)

F. For another way of thinking about how privilege works, here's an analogy. Imagine a racetrack with all those little divided aisles for people to run. Have a rich, white, cisgendered, straight male on the farthest aisle, and he has an aisle that only has a few hurdles. Have a rich, white, cisgendered, straight female on the next aisle, and she has a couple more hurdles. Have a rich, cisgendered, straight female of color on the next aisle, and she has a few more hurdles than the rich, cisgendered, straight white female. Keep going down the line, adding more and more hurdles as you add each form of lack of privilege. And if you've got a situation where intersectionality is often at work -- for example, a PoC who lives in poverty -- throw an additional few hurdles into their aisle beyond what they already had.

Now, let everyone run the race. It's likely that straight rich white guy is going to finish first. And as for everyone else -- well, many of them will still make it over their hurdles and get there too, but it's going to take some people a lot more effort than others. And some people have so many hurdles that they're going to be psychologically beaten from the get-go. No, being white didn't get you where you are now -- nobody showed up in a car and drove you to the end of the race simply because you're white. But being white made it easier to finish that race, even though you will have had additional hurdles from the other ways you may lack privilege (being gay, poor, etc). No matter how many hurdles you had, at least you didn't have the additional hurdles that the PoC faced.

Also, what's even more unfair is when that white guy finishes and says, "Well, I got here on my own two feet, so I don't know what you all are whining about! If I can do it, so can you!" That's the nature of privilege, both to discount the ways it helps us and to refuse to see the ways a lack of privilege makes it harder for others.


8. Read. Read read read read read. I suggest starting with these blogs: Angry Black Woman (http://www.theangryblackwoman.com), stuff white people do (http://stuffwhitepeopledo.blogspot.com/), and Resist Racism (http://resistracism.wordpress.com/). There's a lot of other amazing anti-racist journals too; try checking the blogrolls on those sites for links to other blogs. (If you're a LiveJournal user, there's syndicated feeds for the blogs I recommended:

Tyra Banks - Just what is she trying to say?



Tyra Banks wins an Emmy. I've seen parts of the Tyra Banks show and I have noticed that she does touch on some important topics. I must say however, that I take issue with some of the things that Tyra does.

Let me start a bit earlier than this years 36th Day Time Emmy Award Show. It starts with America's Next Top Model.



When this show came out I had no interest. The show ran for many seasons and eventually I found myself pausing. I watched it a bit and found the show to be somewhat interesting. The process of posing in various creative environments was intriguing to me. But ultimately the show is about looking a certain way and being able to sell product. I wasn't watching the show much to begin with but I made the decision to ignore the show all together.

At some point down the road, I learned that the show even featured a few plus models and also a transgendered woman. Is this improvement in the fashion world? Perhaps, but ultimately modeling is a shallow industry.

In 2007 tabloids had a field day when they snapped a shot of Tyra in a bathing suit looking heftier than usual.



Tyra's response was to appear on her talk show wearing the same swim suit to show the world that she is not that heavy.


Tyra addresses 2007 tabloid photos


Tyra Banks addresses 2007 tabloid headlines


Tyra Banks addresses negative comments


Tyra's last words were "Kiss my fat ass!"

I find Tyra's stunt to be a contradiction. She admits that the paparazzi hurt her feelings but had also stated that her curvy photo was beautiful and she maintains high self-esteem.

I think that she really went out of her way to prove that she doesn't care and even further to prove that she is not heavy. While I would have just left the issue alone I am not Tyra.

I am not shaming Tyra for feeling offended by the actions of the paparazzi. My issue is that Tyra has made on going statements that she appreciates all shapes, sizes and looks but I do not believe this is so. Not only has she formerly made her living as a model, not only does she host a modeling show but she feels the need to defend herself to extremes. She contradicts herself and this is what bothers me.

It's not the end of the world for me but I think she sends very mixed messages to the many young girls who watch and admire her.

Now on to her Emmy win..

This morning as I was driving to work I was listening to the KROQ radio station morning show, Kevin & Bean. I stopped listening to KROQ's music years ago but still listen to the morning show from time to time. To be honest I'm not being a good little feminist when I do as the two hosts have a tendency to be quite sexist.

I learned of Tyra's Daytime Emmy win through their entertainment announcement. Tyra has appeared on the Kevin & Bean radio show several times in past years. I can't remember which host it was, but one had a major crush on her.

In recent years that crush has all but faded and both hosts have ridiculed her for her bathing suit contradiction and now for her speech at the Daytime Emmy Awards. The morning show aired clips of Tyra's acceptance speech and I admit it unnerved me. In her own words, Tyra dedicated her award to women who feel they are not beautiful on the inside or the outside. Tyra said she related to these women. Kevin & Bean scoffed at this as Tyra is after all an ex-supermodel. This of course does not mean that she has not felt unsure of herself in her own life time.

I however, feel that she doesn't quite know what it is to be someone who doesn't receive the attention that she does and is not sought after as she is. Understand that this is not jealousy. I simply get the sense that Tyra is not sincere. Could I be wrong? Surely.

I mentioned earlier that the Kevin and Bean from the Kevin & Bean show are sometimes quite sexist. Well, this morning's show was a perfect example of that. As they went on and on about how Tyra was a walking contradiction they played a radio drop in which some high pitched whiney voices sang, "Tyra is a big fat whore!"

I do not hate Tyra Banks but I feel she is not always genuine. Do I think she's a "big fat whore"? Of course not. If you dislike the way a public figure behaves then simply know that. But how is it that these two individuals actually find enjoyment out of degrading this woman? I guess I should really let go of the guilty pleasure and stop listening to their morning show just as I stopped watching Tyra's modeling show!

Lastly, I'd just like to say that I am not sure what Tyra's true message is to her viewers. I reiterate, that she sends a contradicting message to her viewers and her admirers. I would not consider her a role model for young women and I do not consider her show to be feminist.

Stipper Doll for kids? I hope this isn't so



Product company Gizmodo states that this doll is no joke. Gizmodo blogger Jesus Diaz states "As far as I can tell, it's a real product. It didn't seem PhotoShopped to me. It feels more like the typical Chinese-made product you can only find in low cost stores."

The Gizmodo website has him exclaiming that, "It rotates. It has blinking lights, a disco ball, and a pole. And it's probably one of the wrongest toys you can give to any girl. Because, unlike the USB Pole Dancer, this one is actually for kids."

So, I don't know if this is real or not. I don't find it humorous even as a joke.

Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream renames popular flavor in order to support gay marriage



Ben and Jerry's Ice Cream is showing their support for gay marriage. For the month of September they have renamed their famous Chubby Hubby ice cream flavor to Hubby Hubby. In addition Vermont ice cream shops will be selling special “Hubby Hubby” sundaes during September.



The product's pint packaging will feature two male figurines on top of a wedding cake.

“The legalization of marriage for gay and lesbian couples in Vermont is certainly a step in the right direction, and something worth celebrating with peace, love - and plenty of ice cream,” Ben & Jerry’s CEO Walt Freese said in announcing the temporary new name.